Skip to content
Music

Where a Concert Ticket's Money Goes in New York: Face Value, Fees, the Venue's Cut and the Resale Rules

A New York concert ticket is not one price flowing to one company.

Madison Square Garden's distinctive curved exterior with illuminated signage in Midtown Manhattan.
Madison Square Garden in Midtown Manhattan, one of New York's major concert venues.Ajay Suresh from New York, NY, USA · CC BY 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

A concert ticket can look simple on a phone screen: one seat, one event, one total price. Behind that total is a chain of contracts among the artist, promoter, venue, ticketing company, payment processor and, sometimes, a reseller. Understanding where the money goes requires separating the face value from ticketing fees and separating the primary market from the secondary market.

The face value starts with the event organizer

Ticketmaster's current consumer guidance says the face value, meaning the base ticket price before required fees, is determined by the event organizer. For a concert, the organizer can include the artist's team, promoter and venue, depending on the deal. Price levels may reflect production costs, venue capacity, demand, tour routing and the artist's pricing strategy.

The face value should not be treated as the ticketing company's revenue. Live Nation Entertainment, Ticketmaster's parent company, describes Ticketmaster largely as an agent that sells tickets on behalf of venues, promoters and other clients. Its public filings state that the ticketing segment generally records service fee revenue rather than the ticket's face value. Cash may pass through the ticketing platform, but accounting treatment and contractual ownership of the money are different questions.

For live music, the base ticket revenue ultimately supports the economics of the show. Artist guarantees or percentage deals, promoter expenses, venue rent, production, labor and other show costs can all sit behind the face value. There is no universal split. A superstar arena tour, a club show, a Broadway style residency and an independent promoter using a rented hall can have entirely different contracts.

What the fees pay for

Required ticketing fees have historically been the most controversial part of the purchase. They can include service charges, facility charges and, in some transactions, order or processing components. Ticketmaster says service fees are negotiated and shared among parties involved in the event, including the venue and ticketing provider, and may include profit. It says venues may use their share for staff, operations and year round building costs, while the ticketing company's share supports technology, customer service, ticket scanning and related systems.

Live Nation's annual filings add an important detail: a significant portion of ticketing service charges is payable to venues and credit card vendors. The U.S. Department of Justice, in its antitrust litigation against Live Nation and Ticketmaster, has described service fees as the product of negotiations between the venue and ticketer and noted that per order fees can also be split between them. Those are allegations and descriptions in pending litigation, not a final judicial finding on liability, but they show why the common assumption that one company simply pockets every fee is too crude.

A facility charge is usually different from a service fee. Ticketmaster states that the venue determines the facility charge and that Ticketmaster does not retain it. The charge helps support the physical venue and event hosting costs. Taxes, where applicable, are government charges rather than revenue to the artist, venue or ticketer.

New York and federal law now emphasize the total price

For years, fans often saw a low advertised ticket price and learned the full cost only near the end of checkout. That model has changed. New York law requires operators, ticket resellers and resale platforms to disclose the total cost of a ticket, including mandatory ancillary fees, before the ticket is selected for purchase. The law also requires a clear disclosure of the portion representing service charges or other fees.

Federal rules reinforce the same direction. The Federal Trade Commission's rule on unfair or deceptive fees took effect on May 12, 2025 for live event tickets and short term lodging. It requires businesses to display the total price, excluding only certain government charges, shipping and optional services, more prominently than other pricing information. The rule does not cap fees or prohibit a particular fee. It targets hidden mandatory charges and misleading price presentation.

As a result, a New York buyer should now be able to compare tickets using the real required price earlier in the process. Taxes or optional delivery choices can still affect the final amount, but mandatory service charges cannot be withheld until the last checkout screen in the way consumers once experienced.

“What has changed is that the required total must be shown much earlier, making it easier to compare seats and platforms before a buyer commits.”

Primary sale versus resale

The money flow changes when a ticket is resold. On a secondary marketplace, the seller, which may be a fan, season ticket holder or professional broker, sets the resale price. Ticketmaster's published policy states that a resale seller receives the proceeds from the resale price minus applicable fees. The artist generally does not receive the seller's markup unless a specific platform or event has a separate arrangement.

New York's ticket law contains several protections and restrictions for resale. Businesses engaged in ticket resale, including online resale marketplaces covered by the statute, are generally subject to licensing requirements. Secondary marketplaces must clearly disclose that they are resale platforms, explain that a ticket may be offered above the established price and disclose refund policies. The platform must also disclose the ticket's established price before the transaction is completed.

New York law also addresses speculative selling. A reseller generally cannot contract to sell a ticket it does not possess or have a contractual right to obtain unless it clearly informs the purchaser of the speculative nature of the transaction in the manner required by law. The state separately prohibits the use of ticket purchasing software, commonly called bots, in violation of the statutory rules.

There are also physical buffer zones around entertainment venues. New York restricts unauthorized street resale within specified distances of venues, with the distance depending on seating capacity. Online resale is therefore not simply a digital version of someone standing outside an arena. It is a regulated market with disclosure, licensing and consumer protection requirements.

Why a $150 ticket does not mean the artist receives $150

A useful way to read a ticket is to treat it as several layers. The base price funds the show economics and is allocated under the artist, promoter and venue agreements. Required service charges can be shared among the venue, ticketing company and other parties. A facility charge generally goes to the venue. Payment processing can be embedded in fees. Taxes go to government. On resale, any markup belongs principally to the reseller, subject to marketplace fees and the applicable contract.

Even the artist's share of show revenue is not the same as artist profit. Touring requires musicians, dancers, crew, buses, hotels, freight, staging, video, insurance, commissions and management. A sold out show can generate large gross receipts and still carry very large expenses.

The most reliable conclusion is therefore not a fixed percentage but a method for reading the transaction. First identify whether the ticket is primary or resale. Second separate the established base price from mandatory fees and taxes. Third recognize that the fee may be contractually shared rather than retained by a single company. Finally, remember that the concert business is settled after costs and contractual guarantees, so gross ticket sales are not equivalent to profit.

For New York fans, the largest recent improvement is transparency. The law still permits high prices and substantial fees, and resale prices can exceed face value. What has changed is that the required total must be shown much earlier, making it easier to compare seats and platforms before a buyer commits.

Related coverage: How A Live Music Venue Actually Makes Money; How session musicians are paid in New York; How New York's Restaurant Reservation System Really Works.


Related